Sponsored Ads



Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Tags

Alternative content

Get Adobe Flash player

Asbestos Video

RSSTwitterfeed

#asbestos on Twitter

Become a Fan on Facebook

Posts Tagged ‘control of asbestos regulations’

Redhills is one of the UK’s leading asbestos and environmental consultancies.

We have produced this document to answer the following asbestos related questions.

    • What is the health risk from exposure to asbestos?
    • What is the Control of Asbestos Regulations?
    • What is the ‘duty to manage’ and who has it?
    • What kinds of building are affected by asbestos regulations?
    • How do I become asbestos compliant?
    • What is an asbestos management survey and do I need one?
    • What is an asbestos register?
    • We are planning to refurbish or demolish some buildings do I need a survey?
    • What are my responsibilities in relation to asbestos training?
    • What should I do if someone has disturbed and damaged asbestos?
    • Where is asbestos found in buildings?

    For answers to all these questions, download the document here.

    May 2, 2012 7:55 am - Posted by Asbestos News  | Comments ( 0 )

    Asbestos Compliance

    The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006 requires asbestos to be managed. This management involves identifying or presuming the presence of asbestos, monitoring and recording its condition and documenting a written plan that describes how the risk will be managed.

    Am I compliant?

    You may have already had an asbestos survey of your building, but this doesn’t mean that you have met the asbestos management requirements of the Regulations you must have a documented Asbestos Management Plan. You must also monitor and record the condition of asbestos materials in the building, keep records up to date and make sure information is available.

    ASBESTOS COMPLIANCETo find out more about our Asbestos Compliance Service, download our product summary sheet.

    About Redhills

    Redhills is part of the Silverdell PLC Group of companies We work with major organisations in the UK whose executives have a duty to protect people, assets and reputation.

    Redhills provides peace of mind through its Specialist Environmental Support Services, majoring on asbestos management and compliance monitoring. Which means that our Clients know their interests are always protected.

    For further information please visit www.redhills.co.uk

    Further information on Silverdell Plc can be found at www.silverdell.plc.uk

    Subscribe to our asbestos surveyors guide blog here

    December 20, 2011 9:49 am - Posted by Asbestos News  | Comments ( 0 )

    The HSE is seeking views on revising the Control of Asbestos Regulations to bring them into line with the parent European Directive.

    The consultation follows the European Commission’s reasoned opinion earlier this year that the UK had under-implemented Article 3(3) of the Directive 2003/18/EC. The Article provides for the exemption of some types of lower-risk work with asbestos from three requirements of the Directive: notification of work; medical examinations; and record-keeping.

    However, the EC decided that the omission in the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006 of the terms ‘non-friable’ and ‘without deterioration of non-degraded material’ broadened the scope of the exemption, allowing more types of asbestos work to be exempt from the three requirements than was intended.

    The HSE had taken the decision to omit the terms because it felt the lack of definition surrounding the terms might confuse duty-holders and make enforcement difficult. Instead, the Regulations introduced a short-term peak exposure limit of airborne fibre, which cannot be exceeded if the exemptions are to apply.

    The nine-week consultation on revising the 2006 Regulations, which proposes revoking them entirely and issuing a single set of revised regulations, confirms the Government’s acceptance of the reasoned opinion and that UK legislation must be changed to include the two omitted terms.

    By complying fully with the reasoned opinion, the UK will ensure that the revised regulations will narrow the types of work to which the exemptions apply. Consequently, employers carrying out some type of low-risk, short-duration maintenance and repair work on asbestos-containing materials will be newly required to:
    • notify the work to the relevant enforcing authority;
    • obtain medical examinations for workers; and
    • maintain a register for each worker of the type and duration of work done with asbestos.

    To comply with the reasoned opinion, but to avoid extending the requirement to hold a licence to carry out short-term, low-risk work, the exemption for licensing will be delinked from the other exemptions and a separate definition of the work for which a licence is required will be set.

    This means that, in future, three categories of work will exist as opposed to two:

    • licensed, to which all requirements apply;
    • non-licensed, which is exempt, as now, from the requirements to notify, carry out medical examinations, and keep medical registers; and
    • a new category called notifiable non-licensed work (NNLW) – for which the three requirements will apply.
    September 7, 2011 7:40 am - Posted by Asbestos News  | Comments ( 0 )

    Asbestos was released into a hospital following health and safety breaches by an NHS Trust and a security firm, a court has heard.

    Northamptonshire NHS Teaching Primary Care Trust, Nutec Security Systems Ltd, and its company director Paul Beeby were fined after the incident at Isebrook Hospital in Wellingborough, Northants. All three pleaded guilty to a breach of health and safety regulations at Wellingborough Magistrates’ Court following a prosecution by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

    The court heard that the trust had employed Nutec to upgrade security at the hospital between April 21 and June 9, 2008. During the work, engineers ran cables through false ceilings and partition walls in public areas, but this led to asbestos fibres being released into the hospital, which had remained open to the public and staff.

    HSE investigators found the trust had not ensured that the contractor had received information about asbestos in the building or planned the project management of the work correctly. They also found Nutec had assumed areas of the hospital did not contain asbestos and Beeby had not ensured his surveys were sufficient to identify if asbestos was present.

    January 24, 2011 8:54 am - Posted by Asbestos News  | Comments ( 0 )

    A Birmingham-based university has been fined, along with a security systems firm, after two workers were exposed to dangerous asbestos fibres while fitting CCTV cameras.

    The worker and a 17-year-old trainee were installing the cameras in the reception area at Aston University’s Recreation Centre on 21 July 2009 when they drilled into material containing asbestos fibres.

    Both the university and Warwickshire-based Access Fire and Security Ltd – the contractor carrying out the work – were prosecuted by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) following the incident.

    Birmingham Magistrates’ Court heard the university failed to follow its own procedures on managing, planning and preparing for the installation and the arrangements were unclear and not widely known within the university.

    Aston University, of Aston Triangle, Birmingham, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 5(1) of the Management of Health and Safety Regulations 1999 and Regulation 4(9)(c) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006 and was fined £4,000 and ordered to pay £2,000 costs.

    Access Fire and Security Ltd, which operates from a unit in Henley Court, Henley-in-Arden, and is registered at an address in Yardley Wood, Billesley, Birmingham, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 5(a) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006 and was fined £1,000 and ordered to pay £1,000 costs.

    December 6, 2010 8:43 am - Posted by Asbestos News  | Comments ( 0 )

    Mitchells & Butlers (M&B) has been fined £14,000 after building workers refurbishing one of its pubs were exposed to asbestos.

    Work was being done to the vacant White Horse in Darlington in September 2007 when workers began drilling into the ceiling of a kitchen that contained asbestos tiles.

    An investigation by the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) found that M&B had surveyed the building for asbestos in June 2007 but that it had changed its refurbishment plans before work commenced and that those areas newly due for a refit had not been checked for the deadly material.

    November 29, 2010 10:28 am - Posted by Asbestos News  | Comments ( 0 )

    Asbestos continues to top the list of causes of death in the workplace. According to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) there are around 4,000 deaths caused by asbestos-related diseases each year in Britain and building owners and managers have a ‘duty of care’ to manage any asbestos in their building.

    Managing asbestos is essential if the building is pre-2000, and includes all non-domestic buildings, whatever the business, as well as the common areas of residential rented buildings, such as halls, stair wells, lift shafts and roof spaces. Asbestos was extensively used as a building material in the UK from the 1950s through to the mid-1980s, as it was ideal for fireproofing and insulation. It can be found in asbestos cement products and insulating board; textured coatings; floor tiles, textiles and composites; sprayed coatings on ceilings, walls and beams/columns; lagging, and as loose asbestos in ceiling or floor cavities. In good condition, asbestos materials are safe, but when damaged or disturbed, asbestos fibres become airborne. This is when tradesmen and other contractors can become affected – giving rise, eventually, some 30 or even 50/60 years hence, to Mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases – and, finally, a very painful death.

    Earlier this month (November) the HSE reported on the case of the boss of a refurbishment firm in North Tyneside being fined for a breach of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006 during a heating upgrade of a property. The firm’s staff were found not to have been given any asbestos awareness training, despite a legal requirement to do so.

    Asbestos management does not only include asbestos awareness training, it also requires that a current survey of a building is readily available to anyone doing work on a building, combined with a management plan to minimise the risks to employees and occupants. According to Independent Training News, the newsletter for the IATP¹, reporting on a recent partnership meeting² “the biggest area of concern was again the failure of duty holders either to be aware of their duty to manage asbestos containing materials …….. and think all they had to do was a survey. Very few asbestos management plans have been seen and this would appear to apply to many very large ‘Blue chip’ organisations as well as the smaller ones.” Clearly, the need for a management plan needs to be better understood by duty holders.

    November 19, 2010 9:00 am - Posted by Asbestos News  | Comments ( 0 )

    Norwich magistrates fined East Anglian Construction the maximum amount for a string of health and safety breaches following a successful prosecution brought by Norwich City Council.

    The company, a subsidiary of Peter Colby Commercials, was fined £30,000 after it pleaded guilty to six charges of breaching the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006.

    The city council was also awarded its full costs of £10,203.

    The charges related to two separate occasions in early 2007 and 2008 when employees of the company were carrying out work in Diamond House, Vulcan Road, Norwich – a property owned by Peter Colby Commercials Ltd

    While working on the property employees removed asbestos insulating board tiles from the ceilings – work which the company was not licensed to carry out.

    Susan Thomas, a City Council Health and Safety Officer, said: “The magistrates clearly viewed this as a serious breach of the regulations. Six charges in total were laid and the maximum fine available to the court was made in each case.

    “These were not trivial health and safety matters and I hope that others who may be thinking of acting in the same way think again. The dangers of working with asbestos are well known and have been for many years and those in control of premises should know what they are dealing with.”

    Source: Build.co.uk

    Asbestos Industry News is the online voice for UK Asbestos News. The site covers information about asbestos management, asbestos surveying, asbestos removal, asbestos recruitment, asbestos claims, asbestos waste, asbestos legislation, asbestos inspection, asbestos related disease, asbestos training and much more. Visit www.asbestosindustrynews.co.uk, and subscribe to the RSS feed. or Subscribe to Asbestos Industry News by Email

    Follow us on Twitter @UK_AsbestosNews

    asbestos surveyors

    November 15, 2010 9:18 am - Posted by Asbestos News  | Comments ( 0 )

    The boss of a refurbishment company has been fined for failing to provide adequate information, instruction and training to workers in the proper procedures when dealing with asbestos.

    Neil Brown, 45, trading as High View Services, of High View, Wallsend, North Tyneside, was fined £360 by North Tyneside Magistrates’ Court today after pleading guilty to breaching Regulation 10(1)(a) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006. He was also ordered to pay £360 costs.

    The court heard how the breach came to light on 6 January 2009 during the investigation of an asbestos-related incident at a North Tyneside Council house in Killingworth, the home of Amanda Cleminson. The incident occurred during a heating upgrade of the property, which involved Mr Brown’s company.

    November 8, 2010 10:48 am - Posted by Asbestos News  | Comments ( 0 )

    The Ministry of Defence (MOD) today received a formal Crown Censure from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) after potentially exposing workers to deadly asbestos fibres.

    Being a Crown body, MOD cannot be prosecuted as a private company would be in the criminal courts. The Censure was received by a senior manager from Defence Estates on behalf of MOD, who attended a formal Crown Censure hearing at HSE’s East Grinstead Office today (13 September 2010).

    Defence Estates is an operating arm of the MOD and is responsible for managing the military estate – including managing asbestos on the estate.

    September 14, 2010 7:36 am - Posted by Asbestos News  | Comments ( 0 )

    A Solihull building firm has been fined £1,000 after failing to take precautions against asbestos while working at a school.

    The Health and Safety Executive prosecuted the company after bosses at Greswolde Constructionin Knowle failed to warn its employees that the substance was present despite being in possession of a survey detailing the location of the asbestos.

    The company pleaded guilty to a breach of regulation 10(1) and one of 11(1)(a) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006. As well as the fine it was also ordered to pay £2,268 costs.

    Stratford-upon-Avon Magistrates Court heard how in July 2009 the firm carried out building work on an extension at Rokeby Primary School in Rugby. Three employees were carrying out the work when they disturbed an area containing asbestos.

    September 1, 2010 11:44 am - Posted by Asbestos News  | Comments ( 0 )

    HSEA Solihull building firm has been fined £1,000 after failing to take precautions against asbestos while working at a school.

    The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) prosecuted the company after bosses at Greswolde Construction Ltd of Station Road, Knowle, failed to warn its employees that the substance was present despite being in possession of a survey detailing where the asbestos was.

    The company pleaded guilty to a breach of regulation 10(1) and one of 11(1)(a) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006. As well as the fine it was also ordered to pay £2,268 costs.

    Stratford-upon-Avon Magistrates Court heard how on 9 July 2009 the firm was contracted to carry out building work on an extension at Rokeby Primary School in Rugby.

    Image and Editorial Source: Build.co.uk

    Asbestos Industry News is the online voice for UK Asbestos News. The site covers information about asbestos surveying, asbestos removal, recruitment, asbestos waste, asbestos legislation, asbestos inspection, asbestos training and much more. Visit www.asbestosindustrynews.co.uk, and subscribe to the RSS feed.

    Follow us on Twitter @UK_AsbestosNews

    Subscribe to Asbestos Industry News by Email

    August 25, 2010 8:19 am - Posted by Asbestos News  | Comments ( 0 )

    £4,000 penalty for ignoring report that could have helped workers

    A shop fitting company has been fined after five workers were exposed to potentially deadly asbestos fibres at the Arndale Centre in Manchester.

    Cambridge-based Eastern Regional Shopfitters Ltd was prosecuted by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) after it ignored a report which stated asbestos was present in a shop it was working on.

    Two workers spent five days ripping out old shop fittings in October 2009 before they discovered that asbestos had been used in some of the ceiling panels. Another three management staff at the Arndale Centre were also potentially exposed to the fibres during routine checks on the work.

    Eastern Regional Shopfitters admitted three breaches of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006 and one of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. It was fined £4,000 at Trafford Magistrates’ Court.

    Mark Green, 45 from Cambridge, was one of the two shop fitters to be exposed to asbestos fibres.

    August 20, 2010 8:43 am - Posted by Asbestos News  | Comments ( 0 )